In The Dark (Part 1): Difference between revisions
From The Joe Frank Wiki
m dpl templates |
m Link update |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|title = [https://www.joefrank.com/shop/in-the-dark-1 In The Dark (Part 1)][https://www.joefrank.com/streaming/shows/?jfsearch=In%20The%20Dark] | |title = [https://www.joefrank.com/shop/in-the-dark-1 In The Dark (Part 1)][https://www.joefrank.com/streaming/shows/?jfsearch=In%20The%20Dark] | ||
|data6 = Joe Frank | |data6 = Joe Frank | ||
|data10 = [[ | |data10 = [[The Best]] | ||
|data11 = [[In The Dark (Part 2)]] | |data11 = [[In The Dark (Part 2)]] | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 07:33, 19 March 2021
| Series | |
|---|---|
| Work In Progress | |
| Original Broadcast Date | |
| 1992 | |
| Cast | |
| Joe Frank | |
| Format | |
| 1 hour | |
| Preceded by: | The Best |
| Followed by: | In The Dark (Part 2) |
There's always a reason why she can't sleep.
In The Dark (Part 1) is a program Joe Frank produced as part of the series Work In Progress. It was originally broadcast in 1992.
Synopsis
- A woman suffers from insomnia.
- The men in her apartment building who annoy her mysteriously disappear, leaving their clothes and a whiff of perfume behind.
- A wealthy businessman's car breaks down in the ghetto.
- He imagines homeless people taking over his house.
- He is picked up by the insomniac woman, realizes that he is her landlord, and is drugged, dressed as a woman, handcuffed to a locked briefcase, and kidnapped.
- He is put in a limo, remembers meeting a woman dressed as Jesus in a bar, is left in the woods.
- Joe discusses the significance of the man's story.
- A Tinny-voiced man talks about having seen idyllic things: wanting to be a bachelor, the setting sun leaving its bloody entrails.
Music
- "The Player" - Thomas Newman (from The Player, 1992) | YouTube
- "Sex" - Thomas Newman (from The Player, 1992) | YouTube
- "Desert Drive" - Thomas Newman (from The Player, 1992) | YouTube
Miscellanea
A brief passage in this program describes an encounter with a bar room Christ much like that presented four years later in Three Shingles.
Commentary
Please see guidelines on commentary and share your personal thoughts in this section.
